The profound rantings of the one like Tom Atkinson… and now art gallery and shop.

Anomaly discovered in Medsafe Safety Report 36 in expected death rates figures

UPDATE: So I dug into the stats from 2008 to 2017 at stats.govt.nz and the total number of historic deaths is exactly  303, 567 over the 10 year period which means averages of:
30,356.7 per year
2,529.7 per month
83.2 per dayThis lets the vaccine off the hook to some extent, if I extrapolate 30,356 per year down to the 42 day period post vaccination we get  3493 "background level" of deaths per 42 days from any cause.
It would be interesting to see how this works segmented by age however. Or maybe not, I just found this interesting study:

Hoeg and colleagues have demonstrated that the expected rates of myocarditis in young persons aged 12-17 could be as high as 162 cases/million persons injected. This is far greater than the background rate of 4 cases/million/year before COVID-19, as described by Arola and colleagues in Finland. Hoeg demonstrated that a young person is more likely to be hospitalized with vaccine-induced myocarditis than ever be hospitalized from COVID-19 respiratory illness.

Sadly, there are 15,424 confirmed myocarditis/pericarditis cases in the US CDC VAERS system. The explosion of sudden cardiac death among high-level athletes has drawn attention to the possibility that COVID-19 vaccination forced upon the players may induce a subclinical or perhaps denied syndrome of myocarditis that can last for months.

At the end of day, people who get Sars2 and survive will get full sterilising natural immunity, they won't get it again nor pass it on to others, yet those who have taken the vaccine have been shown to be able to still get and spread the virus

----
The following is an email I just sent to Medsafe and co. Did you like it how I inserted promo links to my latest EP in there? Cool idea huh. The email...

Verbatim copy of the email I sent to Medsafe

Dear Medsafe, CC: Jacinda, RNZ, bFM news, MOH general enquiries,
this email is aimed at Medsafe, you are CC'ed FYI.

In medsafe safety report 36, why does the expected death rate change from 1173 to 1653? By my calculation, the observed total of 1448 deaths post vaccination sits between the two, straddling statistical safety at "matchpoint".

Also, not sure if death is considered a serious adverse event or not, but only 1,290 have been reported to date, whereas 1,448 total people died in the 21 days after vaccination (actually 42 days for two shots), which I thought odd. I guess the 1,290 only includes people who definitely were killed by the vaccine, yes? Still though.... even that 1,290 is above (one of) the expected baseline rates of 1173 which proves the vaccine is deadly and in need of recall. Or not... if you go with the other 1653 number, then you can consider it safe and an elixir of life. So which number is correct and why the change? Whatever the case hopefully Jacinda will reconsider those silly vaccine passports - as they are a waste of time since they have no benefit. What is the point of vaccine passports by the way? Nelson Mandela would be turning in his grave at the resurrection of Apartheid about world presently.
Also, Jacinda - since we voted for the right to die, just let us die yeah? Cease protecting us please. End the lockdowns. Did you consider the suicide rate in your calculations?
As a side note - you should listen to my COVID-19 Tentacle EP Out Now! Featuring Chloe Swarbrick in the intro. Back to the death rate...

intramusclular Injection diagram

Since it (the extrapolated expected death rate values) were being used as a "random 21 day period between 2008-2019" it (death rate number) should not change. As It has the same source, an 11 year period:

Data for expected death rates was obtained from the AESI background rate (SAFE) study provided by the University of Auckland. The age-specific background rates used are the average from 2008-2019.

The tables are titled:
Observed-versus-expected deaths by age group from any cause, up to 21 days after dose 1, 19 February 2021 to 31 August 2021
Observed-versus-expected deaths by age group from any cause, up to 21 days after dose 2, 19 February 2021 to 31 August 2021
Both tables should compare to the same "expected deaths" number 2008-2019 but it goes from 1173 to 1653 - why is that?
I was unable to find this AESI background rate SAFE study - can you point me in the right direction or send it to me please?
Finally, when I am able to consider one number - not two - what is the period this number covers? Is it 21 days or 42 days?
Since the comparison data is intended for comparison to another 21 day period, it is most likely to be 21 days (implying a baseline death rate per year of either (365/21)* 1173  |to| 1653 = 20,387 | 28,730 deaths per year from all causes.
By the way, I would have thought in NZ (5M/81yr) a rough ballpark rate to equal 61,728 deaths per year would be the baseline not 20 to 28k, based on our average lifespan 81 years and 5M population? Perhaps life expectancy is not the same as average lifespan. 
But if the number comes from a 42 day period (which I suggest is fair based on 2 vaccine shots x 21 days) the vaccine steps over the line into the "proven harmful" category with the 1173 number by increasing one's chance of death on average by 23% rather than reducing it to 87.6% of previous showing safety with the 1653 number. A German study shows football players are 500% more likely to die during play, recently 6 people died from heart attacks during football games.
For these comparison percentages, I'm summing the deaths 21 days after vaccine for both the first (789) and second (659) shots, giving a total of 1448 deaths over a total of 42 days after both shots.
If the 1173 is correct, but only represents 21 days, then in my analysis it would be 2346 which is way higher than the total 1448 deaths after vaccine, meaning the vaccine is some kind of life elixir. I could not find the AESI study anywhere online. In fact, when I used negative keywords in Google, such as -covid and -2021 -2020 to try to remove COVID related info, I still could not find anything, making me doubt the "rate of all-cause death" here dubious. I guess I can check the stats.govt.nz next, which I intend to do now in fact.
Finally - don't forget to listen to my COVID-19 Tentacle EP Out Now! Featuring Chloe Swarbrick in the into.
-----------

UPDATE REGARDING 108 FOOTBALLERS DROPPING DEAD RECENTLY:

On the subject of Football players who drop dead of cardiac arrest while playing....
At this Summit News article Another Football Player Suddenly Collapses During Game is 3 videos illustrating it. The text below is taken from an article titled 5-fold increase in sudden cardiac deaths in FIFA players

Not 24 athletes, not 30, nor 75 - Since December, 183 professional athletes and coaches have suddenly collapsed! 108 of them died! According to the literature, the phenomenon of collapsing athlete breakdown for reasons unrelated to injury is rare.

According to Wikipedia, under "List of association footballers who died while playing", in 2001-2020 there was an average of 4.2 deaths per year attributed to SCD or SUD, the vast majority being SCD. In contrast, in 2021, according to our list, there were 21 cases of SCD/SUD among FIFA players. In other words, instead of 4 SCD/SUD deaths per year (according to Wikipedia data), or 5 cases per year (calculated according to the BMJ) during 2001-2020, 21 players have died so far this year.
Having said all this... here is a dude who did not get a vaccine and was ravaged by COVID:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/mma/article-10248631/UFC-legend-Diego-Sanchez-ravaged-Covid-blot-clots-legs.html
Dr John Campbell Explains The Heart Risk after Vaccines

Posted by tomachi on December 1st, 2021 filed in Business, Economy, Politics, Science